There is so much buzz nowadays about the concept of leadership. Everyone that has some position of authority seems to call themselves leaders. To burst the bubble, that is not what leadership really means. Yes, getting certain positions does open up the opportunity to lead. For example, if someone is the president of a country then being a good leader would definitely help them in that role. John Maxwell, does provide some very good insights on the topic and mentions that the position is merely level one (of five levels) in the ladder to be a real leader. He also points out that the organization is always one level behind the leader, so if someone is always stuck at level one, the organization will struggle to achieve any meaningful results. This is usually followed by constant churn of people coming in and then leaving.
Leadership can be very complex in larger organizations but it really comes down to some basic principles to be an effective leader. Here are a few:
Once, the vision (The concept of MTP is a great way to create vision statements) is fairly well understood, then it's time to sell it to others for them to join in on the mission of achieving that vision. Good communication is critical which also goes into how the leader enables that the team for the vision. Humility really comes into play as an important characteristics of a leader. One has to accept that the focus is on the vision and not yourself. In the bible, the Jewish messiah is a great example of being selfless at all times. Most aspiring leaders fail at the art of humility as they always seems to like authority and the spotlight of credit and so forth. It is very important to listen and enable within the context of the vision. Let the smart people share their part of how things could or should work. Of course others will praise you for achievements but have to avoid distracting your energy away from achieving even more. Never forget to share the accolades with the team that is helping to achieve the vision. The final important point is that the leader has to set examples. Always demonstrate full belief in the vision and going out in front to fight for it. In ancient times, kings would lead their troops into battle. Not just hide in the palace and hope things work out. The leader has to keep learning, get into the trenches and support the mission 100%. This could mean doing just about anything to help. Outsourcing is great to get help but you just cannot outsource the core of ensuring things get done. Taking these principles and applying them to even more complex situations will work. For example, the CEO of a large multi-divisional corporation has to know how to organize the business to succeed without the need to babysit every single employee or manager. The CEO has to rely on important leaders within the team to do their part. Typically, for large companies, it make sense for the leader to be at what John Maxwell calls level 5 leadership. This is where the leader focuses on creating other leaders in the business or movement. The world has needs to fix many issues, so there is no shortage on the need for great leaders that can take on challenging issues and work with their teams to find the best sustainable solutions. Let's be part of the solution and not the problem. Hope this gave some good insights, feel free to share your perspective Most emerging countries have versions of what is called a "Shanty town" or Ghetto. This is usually those living in poverty that does not have a proper home. We all know this creates a vicious cycle of abuse, crime and more poverty. We also know that in some locations that are in some ways affluent, the ability to build homes are limited which causes prices to skyrocket way more than they should. What if there is a way to build high quality homes while keeping the cost in check. Many of these poor people will not want a home that is considered "poor people house", They want to feel as a part of the main stream. There has been several initiatives to solve this problem including the $300 House initiative. They took the approach of building houses which involves the occupants doing most of the work and using a variety of local materials. Here comes 3D Printing This technology has been around for some time and has continued to mature as a main stream manufacturing technique. Now this is also being applied to housing. There are several companies that have actually developed working solutions as well. The main ones are Mighty Buildings and Icon Build. They have built real houses and continue to refine their processes to make this more affordable. What problem does a good home need to solve? 1. Comfort 2. Safety 3. Health 4. Self-esteem If these are covered per local situation, then it will be accepted over time. Some of the advantages with 3D printing are to reduce waste on building sites, leveraging new materials that could be more cost effective and a host of others.
Who will pay for this? The main reasons you have these "Shanty Towns" is that most of the occupants cannot afford to build or buy a regular home. On the flip side, developing economies have less resources to provide a home for every citizen or family. It's great to talk about new technologies but we also need to solve the problem of business models. How to make it good business? The first step is to get the cost down significantly without compromise on quality. Kind of like how the advent of cloud technologies significantly reduce the cost to use compute resources and provide many 'Software as a Service' solutions extremely cheap. Each location has its own local needs such as earthquakes, hurricanes, break ins etc. The second step is then to figure out payment structures. This could be done by the owners themselves or even the government providing some support. At least government may have lands they could provide to citizens. An example structure would be helping the future owner to gain an in demand skill which gets him/her employment to pay for the home. What are the next steps? Ultimately, at this stage it's all about education on what is possible. Get emerging countries governments to at least explore the relevant innovations and encourage adaption for local use - evangelizing and Incentivizing innovation. One has to take a long run perspective on these issues as that could actually justify the economics of making the appropriate investments. It may help to reduce crime, increase the supply of skill labor and improve quality of life for all. What you do think of this? Share your perspective. Most people take notes with a regular paper notepad or book and then transcribe into typed notes for a meeting and so on. How could we replace this with digital technology? The basic requirements here:
Some people are actually good at typing on a laptop very fast, so they have moved on from relying on the writing experience. Typical Writing Use Cases
There are other use cases but these jump out as the lion share of regular writing which will be explored with the various electronic writing options. Reusable Notebooks and Smartpens There are several solutions out there that can be considered a step up from the traditional paper Rocketbook - Allows the user to erase the writings and use a smartphone to copy and send the writings to the cloud - also has the ability to support writing to text conversion. Essentially, the notebook can be used many times over. Smartpens - These pens use specially designed notebooks (not reusable) but the pen would keep the details and transfer into the cloud wirelessly connecting to a phone or computer. Regular Tablets Most people would have an Ipad or Android (Samsung, Google etc.) tablet as they provide a lot of functions and applications. However, most will agree that even with a pen, writing on these will not give you the paper experience but maybe useful to take some quick notes or demonstrate some concepts. However for real writing these are not ideal. There are some workarounds on the market especially to add special screens which improves the experience. A popular one is paperlike for the Ipad. Some would complain that this will affect the viewing experience on the tablet while not really solving the ultimate paper experience. Hands down, tablets are great all round devices and provide lots of benefits but that paper writing experience is not there. The biggest disadvantage with these is that more functions also brings a lot more distractions. As tablets are here to stay; Is it time to move away from the hand writing approach to taking notes? E-ink or E-paper Tablets The concept of E-ink has changed the way we read books, especially popular with Amazon Kindles. However, there are several tablets built with this technology for writing purposes and several popular tablets in this space. The verdict is that these are very close to paper in respect to writing experience with an electronic implementation. Remarkable - This is a small company that builds this tablet primarily as a notetaker with the ability to read some ebook formats. It also allows marking up on books specially PDFs. There is big buzz on the Remarkable 2 coming out in September 2020 with an improved design. The complaints for these devices is the lack of advanced software features and low on device storage space. However, they get high marks in respect to the writing experience. The size of both generations is 10.3” which is a good sweet spot for portability. This is probable the best candidate for digital note taking out there. Onyx Boox Tablets - These are similar to the Remarkable in terms of being E-ink devices and they run Android as the main OS. The writing experience on the low end ones are not so great. The Max 3 seems to be the most genuine writer from this company but of course the size is 13.3” which is huge for every day portability. Sony DPT Family - Sony also has a platform which they sell directly as well as OEM to Fujitsu and Quirklogic. They are very similar to the Boox Max 3 especially in terms of some software features and writing experience. The experience on these are very good but the cost is fairly high running from $700 and up. The Papyr from Quirklogic seems to get very good marks for sharing the writing with others in real time as well as integration with Cloud services. There are some good options here and it seems the disparity is mostly around software features. The 13.3” tablets could be good for something to keep on a desk for planning and tracking things while the smaller ones are good for doing the regular everyday note taking. The common concern here is cost since they will not give the full functions of a regular tablet. Can one have a regular tablet and still get one of these? Conclusion The ideal here is to have a paper like experience in writing, translate the writing materials into readable text and be able to store and share electronically while being sustainable. Looking at the options presented, there seems to be some positives and some negatives about fully replacing the paper notebook while benefiting from new technologies. On the one hand, the E-Ink options are promising but also come at a very high price with limited functions. Traditional tablets have many functions but are very poor in terms of the writing experience. To keep with the traditional approach, the Rocketbook is a great contender as it keeps the writing feel and provides some technology improvements plus the cost is very affordable. While, it seems the E-inks may be the best choice overall with the potential for automation, it seems there is a gap especially around pricing with a truly electronic solution. Delivering something that keeps the traditional experience and will not break the bank. Ultimately, below $200. With all of those options it also comes down to the specific writing feel for each individual. What is your take on this? Have you used one of these devices? |